And since the only thing trading income or losses ever provide is a purchase or use of time, it's essentially as if June never happened. And given the events of the past month, I can more than live with that. Now can we somehow undo that knock on the head??
I've certainly beat the topic of my personal Q2 to death over recent weeks, and so I won't dwell on it further except to reinforce that it was NOT simply a matter of declining volatility and change in market pace. For If I had to apportion the cause for the Q2 blip, I'd allocate 50% to indifference/burnout/sloppiness, 30% to health & scheduling conflicts with one of the most expensive tooth fillings one has probably ever had, and only 20% to reduced volatility. As I've long said, good traders make money in all markets ... they just happen to make more in those which favor their pace. The first one is 100% my fault, which will be remedied, and I'm diligently working on the second one.
Which brings us full circle to last week's video on "outliers". Naysayers will continue to shout that Q408 per the attached chart (click to enlarge) was an "outlier" and Q209 is "realism". On the other end of the spectrum, eternal optimists will say Q209 was an outlier. The truth, of course, is they're both outliers. Ummm ... that's why Olympic judges often throw out the high and low scores.
And isn't it interesting that the average of the two outliers (green line) comes oh so close to the average of the last six quarters (red line), which makes complete sense when looking at the "non-market" attributes of both quarters: Q408 intense focus, committed, zoned in, healthy vs. Q209 often indifferent, lazy, sloppy, mega-schedule conflicts, etc.
Note I didn't mention market factors at all in the above paragraph. Again, decent traders make money in all markets, while poor traders blame changes in the market for changes in their performance. In my view, the primary separating line between the two is commitment and focus.
Which brings us full circle to last week's video on "outliers". Naysayers will continue to shout that Q408 per the attached chart (click to enlarge) was an "outlier" and Q209 is "realism". On the other end of the spectrum, eternal optimists will say Q209 was an outlier. The truth, of course, is they're both outliers. Ummm ... that's why Olympic judges often throw out the high and low scores.
And isn't it interesting that the average of the two outliers (green line) comes oh so close to the average of the last six quarters (red line), which makes complete sense when looking at the "non-market" attributes of both quarters: Q408 intense focus, committed, zoned in, healthy vs. Q209 often indifferent, lazy, sloppy, mega-schedule conflicts, etc.
Note I didn't mention market factors at all in the above paragraph. Again, decent traders make money in all markets, while poor traders blame changes in the market for changes in their performance. In my view, the primary separating line between the two is commitment and focus.
I of course know with 100% certainly that Q209 is no more indicative of sustainable performance than Q408 was. For they both are what they are, composite sample reflections of life and choices ... with some market seasoning sprinkled in.
And now we look ahead. Tomorrow morning, I visit Boston's Beth Israel Spine Center to give another expert team a crack (pun intended) at solving my nagging back problem. After that, it will be back to work to focus on solving my nagging trading indifference problem.
Both will be fully resolved. After all, I'm a trader ... I don't give up ... ever.
And now we look ahead. Tomorrow morning, I visit Boston's Beth Israel Spine Center to give another expert team a crack (pun intended) at solving my nagging back problem. After that, it will be back to work to focus on solving my nagging trading indifference problem.
Both will be fully resolved. After all, I'm a trader ... I don't give up ... ever.
The calendar of course gives us a chance to memorialize the past, benchmark against ourselves and others, while turning the page for a fresh start.
Yet do we really need an arbitrary piece of paper to tell us it's OK to renew? Hell, we're traders and we profit taking the other side of popular opinion. We can turn the page any damn day or moment we please.
The future is all that matters.
And the future is very, very bright.
This time, I think we'll need eye black.
This time, I think we'll need eye black.